Tag: Geoarchaeology
These items have all been tagged with the tag "Geoarchaeology", You can see other tags in the Tag Cloud
Any archaeologist who has excavated has encountered traces of burrowing animals, usually in the form of filled burrows visible as differences in the color or consistency of the sediment. While working in California during the latter half of the 1970s, I became curious about how all that burrowing may have affected the archaeological record. No one I asked seemed to know much about the critters or the nature of their impacts on the sites we were investigating. Burrowing rodents are quite common in California, and pocket gophers or ground squirrels were actively burrowing in virtually every site at which I worked. At the same time, I was taking classes in geology at San Jose State University and beginning to explore the interfaces between geology and archaeology, an area that would shortly come to be called geoarchaeology. I was mostly working on using soil chemistry to identify the uses or functions of different areas in archaeological sites and deposits. However, I took a course on soil ecology and learned that there was quite a bit known about the habits of animals that live in the soil including burrowing mammals.
Write Comment (0 Comments)
Instructions for Running the Pocket Gopher Disturbance Simulation
This program simulates the effects that burrowing by pocket gophers have on the vertical distribution of artifacts and sediments and the disruption of sedimentary structures (stratification) within archaeological deposits. It relies on a model of pocket gopher disturbance I developed intermittently between 1981 and 1986. Details of this model are presented in an article I published in the journal Geoarchaeology (vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 185-208) in 1992 titled Effects of Pocket Gopher Burrowing on Archaeological Deposits: A Simulation Approach. Click here to read about the history of my development of the model.
Write Comment (0 Comments)
Effects of Pocket Gopher Burrowing on Archaeological Deposits: A Simulation Approach
Christopher Pierce
The construction of burrows and movement of sediment by pocket gophers alter archaeological deposits by causing vertical size-sorting of artifacts, destruction of fragile artifacts, disruption of sedimentary structures, and organic enrichment of the subsurface. To evaluate the long-term effects of exposure to burrowing, a simulation was developed based on quantitative information on pocket gopher burrows and rates of sediment movement. Simulation results indicate the development of a distinct stone zone composed predominantly of particles greater than 6 cm after 4000-5000 years, and a logarithmic pattern to the rate of strata disruption. The patterns produced by the simulation compare well with patterns exhibited by actual archaeological deposits belonging to California's Milling Stone Horizon. These results suggest that current notions concerning the Milling Stone Horizon and other aspects of California prehistory may require revision, and that more emphasis must be placed on formation process research in such settings.
Published as:
Effects of Pocket Gopher Burrowing on Archaeological Deposits: A Simulation Approach. Geoarchaeology Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 185-208, 1992.
Download a PDF reprint of the published version of this paper.
Run the simulation program discussed in this paper.
